• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Services
    • Accounting
    • Payroll
    • Tax
    • Compliance
    • Incorporation Services
    • CFO & COO Services
  • About Us
  • Pricing
  • Contact Us
  • Consult
  • Pay Bill
Indian CPA | Virtual Tax Consultancy serving all over US

Indian CPA | Virtual Tax Consultancy serving all over US

Indian Tax Consultant serving across all 50 States

  • Personal Tax
  • Personal Tax FAQ
  • Personal Finance
  • Personal Finance FAQ
  • Subscribe to Indian CPA

Disappointed in Your Tax Refund?

March 2, 2019 by Roy Vargis CPA CMA CFM EA CITA ACMA CGMA Leave a Comment

Article Highlights:

  • Average Refund Down
  • Tax Filings Down
  • Effects of Lower Refunds
  • Actual Tax Generally Lower
  • How This Happened

If your tax refund is less than you anticipated, you are not alone. In a report issued by the Treasury Department on February 14, the average refund it is paying in 2019 has dropped to $1,949 from $2,135 in the prior year. In addition, the number of returns filed so far has dropped from 13.5 million last year to 11.4 million this year for the same period.

With all the hype about how tax reform would reduce taxes, taxpayers were anticipating larger refunds this year but instead are receiving less, on average. This has left the Republican lawmakers who passed the tax reform scrambling to explain why the refunds are lower.

Lower refunds can be especially harmful to taxpayers who count on their refunds to pay their annual property taxes, holiday spending and other debts. Many count on the refunds to pay for summer vacations and other discretionary spending. Some who normally receive refunds may even find themselves owing money this year.

Although most taxpayers will actually pay less in taxes this year, this does not necessarily translate into increased refunds. For most, the tax cut provided more take-home pay during 2018, instead of adding to their refunds at the end of the year. This decrease in withholding spread over 52, 26 or 24 paychecks is far less noticeable than a lump sum added to the refund.

How did this happen? The culprit is generally the amount of tax you had withheld from your paycheck each payday. The tax reform was passed at the very end of 2017, not allowing the IRS sufficient time to adjust the employer withholding tables or the W-4 – Employee’s Withholding Allowance Certificate – for the new law. When they did a couple of months later, the revised withholding tables and W-4 produced lower withholding, leading to the lower refunds.

The IRS was aware of this and issued notices almost weekly cautioning taxpayers that the lower withholding would lead to lower refunds or perhaps even them owing instead of receiving a refund. The General Accounting Office estimates that the number of taxpayers who will owe taxes this year will increase from 18 to 21 percent.

If you are affected and want to avoid the same thing from happening next year, you may want this office to compare your current withholding to your projected tax liability so that you can adjust your withholding to produce the result you desire on your 2019 return.

Filed Under: Personal Tax, Tax related

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

More to See

January 2020 Individual Due Dates

January 2, 2020 By Roy Vargis CPA CMA CFM EA CITA ACMA CGMA

How Can I Prove Financial Hardship to the IRS If I Can’t Pay My Taxes?

January 2, 2020 By Roy Vargis CPA CMA CFM EA CITA ACMA CGMA

Footer

Recent

  • Individual and Business Provisions of the CARES ACT
  • January 2020 Individual Due Dates
  • How Can I Prove Financial Hardship to the IRS If I Can’t Pay My Taxes?
  • Is Your Will or Trust Up-to-Date?
  • Understanding Tax Lingo

Search

Copyright © 2022 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in